Beta Version

ShodhSarthi

DULS Guide to

πŸ”¬Basics of Research

🎯 What is Research?

Research is "a structured and scientific approach used to collect, analyze, and interpret quantitative or qualitative data to answer research questions or test hypotheses." More comprehensively, research methodology represents a systematic method to resolve research problems through data gathering using various techniques.


🧠 Origin

  • 'Research' is derived from the French word 'rechercher' which means to seek again.
  • It is made up of two words: Re + Search
  • Re means again, repeat
  • Search means to examine, to probe
  • Research is an intensive study in a systematic way on a subject that aims to perform research in a transparent manner with fair, replicable results.

πŸ”¬ Scientific Inquiry Foundation

Scientific inquiry involves careful observation, asking questions, formulating hypotheses, experimental testing, and refining hypotheses based on experimental findings. This process includes creating testable hypotheses through inductive reasoning, testing these hypotheses through experiments and statistical analysis.

✨ Core Characteristics of a Good Quality Research: Methodological Rigor

  • Systematic Approach: Clear, logical sequence of steps with consistent procedures
  • Validity and Reliability: Results accurately reflect phenomena studied
  • Reproducibility: Other researchers can replicate methodology
  • Ethical Standards: Protection of human subjects and honest reporting

Definition

"Research may be defined as a method of studying problems whose solutions are to be derived partly or wholly from facts."
– W.S. Monroes
"Research is a systematic effort to gain new knowledge."
– Redman & Mori
"Research is a systematic inquiry to describe, explain, predict and control the observed phenomenon."
– Earl Robert Babbie

Purpose and Functions of Research

Concept of Research

Research, at its core, is a systematic and scientific pursuit of knowledge aimed at uncovering information about a specific topic or issue. D. Slesinger and M. Stephenson defines it in the Encyclopaedia of Social Sciences, 'it involves the manipulation of things, concepts or symbols for the purpose of generalising to extend, correct or verify knowledge.' This process is both an art and a science, demanding intellectual curiosity, precision, and adherence to established methodologies.

Purpose of Research

The primary purpose of research is to address questions through systematic and scientific procedures, ultimately seeking to discover truths yet unknown. Research objectives broadly fall into four categories:

  • To gain familiarity or new insights
  • To accurately portray characteristics of individuals, situations, or groups
  • To determine frequency or association between phenomena
  • To test hypotheses of causal relationships between variables

Functions of Research

Exploring New Facts

Pushing the boundaries of current understanding

Uncovering Relationships

Enhancing comprehension of complex systems

Creating Knowledge

Fostering innovation and new product development

Identifying Opportunities

Guiding strategic decision-making

Solving Problems

Driving development across diverse sectors

Qualities of Good Research

Systematic

Follows organized procedures

Logical

Based on sound reasoning

Empirical

Based on observation and evidence

Replicable

Can be repeated with similar results

Time Bound

Completed within defined timeframes

Transparent

Open and clear methodology

πŸ“Š Quality Indicators

Data Quality: Appropriate sampling, unbiased collection, inclusive methodology, secure storage

Analytical Rigor: Appropriate methods matched to research questions, transparent analysis, appropriate interpretation

Basic Components of Research

According to Scholar (Pardede, 2018), research involves the following basic components:

  • Title/Topic: Predicts content, catches reader's interest, reveals nature of manuscript, contains keywords for search
  • Author
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
  • Objectives
  • Research Methods/Methodology
  • Results and conclusion
  • References

The Research Process: A Step-by-Step Guide

Conducting effective research requires a structured approach, following a series of interconnected steps. This methodical progression ensures thoroughness, rigor, and the production of credible and reliable findings.

1Formulating the Research Problem

This initial step involves identifying a broad area of interest, narrowing it down to a specific, manageable problem, and clearly defining the research question(s). It often includes conducting preliminary background research to understand existing knowledge gaps.

2Extensive Literature Survey

A comprehensive review of existing scholarly articles, books, and other relevant sources helps to understand what has already been done, identify theoretical frameworks, and refine the research problem and objectives.

3Developing Hypotheses

Based on the literature review and research problem, testable statements (hypotheses) are formulated. These are tentative explanations that the research aims to verify or refute.

4Preparing the Research Design

This involves creating a detailed plan for the research, including the overall approach (e.g., experimental, descriptive), data collection methods, and data analysis techniques. It serves as a blueprint for the entire study.

5Determining Sample Design

For studies involving populations, this step defines the method for selecting a representative subset (sample) of individuals or entities to study. Various sampling techniques exist, such as simple random, stratified, cluster, or sequential sampling.

Significance of Research

Advances Knowledge

Enhances understanding of various phenomena

Develops New Ideas

Fosters innovation and creativity

Solves Societal Problems

Provides solutions to challenges facing society

Supports Development

Helps in the development of society

Informs Decision-Making

Serves as basis for government planning

Develops Logical Thinking

Enhances critical thinking skills

Steers Innovation

Drives technological advancement

Challenges to Research

Interpretation and Generalizability

Difficulties in interpreting results and applying findings broadly

Data Quality Issues

Problems with data accuracy, completeness, and reliability

Methodological Challenges

Issues with research design and implementation

Data Challenges

Difficulties in data collection, storage, and analysis

Ethical Considerations

Ensuring research meets ethical standards

Research in AI Environment

Benefits of AI in Research

Increased Productivity

Large amounts of data can be processed quickly, allowing researchers to focus on higher-level tasks

Reduced Errors

AI helps reduce errors and improve accuracy by automating repetitive tasks

Challenges and Limitations of AI

Lack of Future Vision

AI tools are limited by training data and may not generate new insights

Lack of Transparency

Issues with accountability and reproducibility

Ethical Considerations

Concerns about bias, fairness, and intellectual property

Regulatory Challenges

Evolving AI regulations and data privacy concerns

Solutions and Strategies

  • Training of AI Literacy: Providing AI education and training to close the knowledge gap and promote productive human-AI collaboration
  • Human-AI Collaboration: Designing workflows that take advantage of both AI and human intelligence
  • Continuous Monitoring: AI models must be updated frequently to remain accurate and relevant

Ethical Imperatives in Research

Research ethics provides a foundational framework for the responsible conduct of all research activities. It establishes essential guidelines and educates researchers, fostering a high ethical standard throughout the investigative process.

Honesty and Objectivity

Be honest when reporting data, findings, procedures, and publication status. Refrain from fabricating, falsifying, or misrepresenting data. Aim to eradicate bias in all facets of research.

Openness and Respect for Intellectual Property

Share information, findings, tools, resources, and data freely while keeping an open mind to criticism and fresh concepts. Honor copyrights, patents, and other intellectual property.

Mentoring, Collegiality, and Social Responsibility

Educate, mentor, and advise students, promoting their well-being and autonomy. Treat colleagues fairly and with respect. Strive to ensure research contributes positively to society.

Integrity and Carefulness

Retain commitments and agreements, behave honorably, and ensure consistency between thoughts and actions. Work diligently and critically, maintaining thorough records of all research activities.

Confidentiality and Responsible Publication

Safeguard confidential communications such as submitted papers, grant proposals, personnel records, trade secrets, and patient information. Publish research primarily to advance scholarship.

Non-Discrimination and Competence

Avoid discrimination based on sex, race, ethnicity, or other factors unrelated to scientific competence. Continuously enhance professional competence through lifelong learning.

References

  1. Kothari, C. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Delhi: New Age International
  2. Pardede, P.(2018). Research components. ELT Module.
  3. Walden University. (n.d.). 07 Research challenges: And how to overcome them. Walden University. Retrieved July 12, 2025. https://www.waldenu.edu/news-and-events/publications/articles/2010/01-research-challenges
  4. Lumenalta. (2024). 9 AI problems in 2025: Common challenges and solutions. Retrieved July 14, 2025. https://lumenalta.com/insights/ai-problems-9-common-challenges-and-solutions
  5. Sultan, M. (2025). Data privacy and security challenges in AI systems. Authorea. DOI: 10.22541/au.174655377.75454191/v1
  6. Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in education (10th ed.). Pearson Education.

Introduction

Research is an essential and systematic endeavour that involves the collection, organization, analysis, and interpretation of information to tackle pressing societal issues. This investigative journey becomes truly scientific when specific, proven methods and techniques are employed to secure, record, measure, analyse, and interpret data. From the initial identification of a problem to the final report, this continuous cycle of research is pivotal to achieving meaningful results.

The first and most crucial step in the research process is selecting and precisely defining the research problem. The entire research endeavour relies on correctly identifying this problem. If researchers do not diagnose the problem accurately, they cannot provide an appropriate solution.

Definition

The term "research problem" refers to a specific question, issue, or area of inquiry that a researcher wants to investigate or explore through the process of research. It refers to some difficulty which a researcher experiences in the context of either a theoretical or practical situation and wants to obtain a solution for the same.

It represents the central focus or challenge that guides the research endeavour. The research problem is typically formulated based on gaps or deficiencies in existing knowledge, unresolved questions, practical concerns, or emerging issues within a particular field or discipline.

βš–οΈ Research Problem Feasibility Assessment

FINER Criteria Framework

βœ… Feasible

Practical and achievable given available resources

🎯 Interesting

Intriguing to researcher and broader field

πŸ’‘ Novel

Makes original contribution to knowledge

βš–οΈ Ethical

No concerns about potential harm

🌍 Relevant

Important to field and society

Characteristics of a Good Research Problem

πŸ’Ž Clarity & Unambiguity

Research Problems should be clearly and precisely stated without confusion, avoiding vague or general statements

🌍 Specificity

Well-defined scope and boundaries

🎯 Relevance/Significance

Addresses important issues that matter to the field and society

βœ… Feasibility

Practical and achievable with available time, resources, and access

πŸ’‘ Novelty/Originality

Explores new facets and contributes new knowledge or insights rather than replicating existing work

⭐ Importance

Addresses significant issues or gaps

πŸ“š Contextualization

Situated within appropriate framework

πŸ“ Precision

Exact and well-articulated

πŸŽͺ Delimitation

Clear boundaries and limitations

βš–οΈ Ethical Considerations

Meets ethical standards and guidelines

Need for Formulation of A Research Problem

Proper formulation of research problems is essential for several reasons:

Provides Direction

Proper formulation of the problem provides a sense of direction to the researcher.

Specifies Scope

Proper formulation specifies the scope of research.

Indicates Limitations

Proper formulation indicates the limitations of the research.

Clarifies Problem

Proper formulation clarifies the problem.

Establishes Assumptions

Proper formulation establishes the major assumption.

Expresses Context

Proper formulation expresses the context of the problem.

Provides Economy

Proper formulation provides economy in research.

βš–οΈ Research Questions vs Hypotheses

❓ Research Questions

Purpose: Explore, describe, or investigate phenomena when limited knowledge exists

Format: Interrogative statements seeking understanding

Types:
  • Descriptive: "What factors influence academic achievement?"
  • Comparative: "What is the performance difference between methods A and B?"
  • Relationship: "What is the relationship between self-efficacy and achievement?"

🎯 Hypotheses

Purpose: Make testable predictions about relationships between variables

Format: Declarative statements predicting specific outcomes

Types:
  • Simple: One independent, one dependent variable
  • Complex: Multiple variables
  • Directional: Specifies expected direction
  • Non-directional: Predicts relationship exists

πŸ€” Decision Framework: When to Use Each

Use Research Questions When:
  • Exploring new topics with limited research
  • Conducting qualitative research
  • Taking inductive approach
  • Limited theoretical background exists
Use Hypotheses When:
  • Testing established theories
  • Conducting quantitative research
  • Taking deductive approach
  • Specific predictions possible

Selection of the Research Problem

When selecting a research problem, consider the following critical factors:

Avoid Overdone Subjects: Subject which is overdone should not be normally chosen, for it will be a difficult task to throw any new light in such a case.
Appropriate Scope: Too narrow or too vague problems should be avoided.
Feasibility: The subject selected for research should be familiar and feasible so that the related research material or sources of research are within one's reach.
Importance: The importance of the subject.
Preliminary Study: The selection of a problem must be preceded by a preliminary study.
Cost Considerations: The cost involved.
Time Factor: Available time and timeline constraints.
Researcher Interest: Interest of the researcher in the subject matter.

πŸ“‹ Resource Assessment Checklist

  • Human Resources: Required expertise, skills, team capacity
  • Financial Resources: Budget for compensation, equipment, personnel
  • Time Constraints: Available timeline for all phases
  • Technical Resources: Equipment, software, facilities needed
  • Access and Permissions: Participant availability, institutional approval

Sources of Research Problems

πŸ₯ Practical Field Experiences

Real-world problems observed in professional practice

Examples: Nursing staff injuries, educational technology challenges, workplace efficiency issues

πŸ“š Literature Gaps

Systematic review to identify contradictions and unexplored areas

Finding: Conflicting results on exercise and mental health in elderly populations

πŸ€” Theoretical Contradictions

Conflicts between different theoretical perspectives

Theory A vs Theory B: Different predictions for same phenomenon

Components of A Research Problem

Topic

Area or domain under investigation.

Research Question

A well-defined and specific question.

Objective

The aims, goals, and expected outcomes of the research.

Scope and Limitations

Explanation of the boundaries and constraints of the study.

Significance

Importance and contribution of the research.

Hypotheses

Testable predictions or assumptions.

Variables

Key factors to be studied and measured.

Methodology

Approach and methods for investigation.

πŸ“ Problem Statement Formulation

Defining a research problem clearly and accurately is essential for a successful research study and must be approached with care. Follow these critical steps in order:

1Broad Area Selection

Begin by choosing a broad field/area/topic of interest based on expertise and passion or significant scientific and intellectual interests.

2Surveying Available Literature

All available literature concerning the problem at hand must necessarily be surveyed and examined before a definition of the research problem is given.

3Gap Identification

Based on your literature survey, pinpoint specific knowledge gaps or contradictions observed.

4Narrowing Focus

Now try to narrow doen your problem by selecting specific feasible components.

5Statement of the Problem

Start articulating the problem in broad terms, addressing either practical concerns or significant scientific and intellectual interests.

6Understanding the Nature of the Problem

Thoroughly examine the origin and nature of the problem. Engage in discussions with knowledgeable individuals who have expertise in the specific issue or related areas to gain deeper insights.

7Developing Ideas Through Discussions / Stakeholder Input

A researcher must discuss his/her problem with his/her colleagues and others who have enough experience in the same area or in working on similar problems.

8Rephrasing the Research Problem

Finally, the researcher must sit to rephrase the research problem into a working proposition. Through rephrasing, the researcher puts the research problem in as specific terms as possible so that it may become operationally viable.

πŸ“‹ Problem Statement Template


A well-formulated problem statement should include:

  • One concise sentence stating the specific issue
  • Clear indication of where and to whom it's relevant
  • Connection to broader theoretical or practical significance
Example: "Is the level of knowledge on recommended nutritional practices related to the nutritional status of pregnant women attending antenatal care in Northern Uganda?"

Types of Research Problems

Descriptive Problems

These issues revolve around describing or recording a specific occurrence, incident, or circumstances.

Exploratory Problems

These problems are made to look deeply into a specific subject or issue, frequently to develop new theories or ideas.

Explanatory Problems

These issues usually involve testing ideas or hypotheses to understand why a certain phenomenon or event happens.

Predictive Problems

Making predictions or estimates about potential occurrences or patterns is required for these issues.

Evaluative Problems

These issues entail determining how well a specific intervention, program, or strategy works.

Conclusion

Defining a research problem is not a single step, but rather a journey of refinement. Initially, the problem is stated in general terms, after which ambiguities are resolved. This ongoing process of thinking and rethinking leads to a more specific formulation of the problem, ensuring that it is realistic in terms of available data and resources, as well as analytically meaningful.

Without correctly identifying the research problem, a researcher may struggle to address it effectively. Therefore, the accurate identification and selection of a research problem at the right time play a crucial role in the successful completion of a research study.

References

  1. Asenahabi, B.M.(2019). Basics of Research Design. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Research, Vol.16, No.5 (ISSN: 2308-1365)
  2. Kothari, C.R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods & Techniques (2nd Rev. Ed.). New Age International Publishers
  3. Madhu, D.M.Hanumanthappa, R, Rosalin Geetha, I. and Kota Karuna Sri (2024). Advances in Agricultural Research Methodology (Vol. 2) (ISBN-978-93-6039-841-5)
  4. Raja, N.V. Research Methodology and Statistics for Home Science (e-book) https://e-books.inflibnet.ac.in
  5. https://epgp.inflibnet.ac.in

πŸ“ Research Design Overview

Research design is the blueprint that guides how you will conduct your study. The right design depends on your research questions, objectives, available resources, and practical constraints.

Why Study Different Types of Research?

Understanding different types of research helps researchers:

  • Choose the most appropriate methodology for their investigation
  • Understand the strengths and limitations of various approaches
  • Design more effective and efficient research studies
  • Interpret and evaluate research findings critically

βš–οΈ Research Designs Vs Research Methodology Vs Research Methods

Research design is the overall plan to answer a research question, while research methodology is the justification and rationale for that plan and the chosen methods. Research methods are the specific tools and techniques used to implement the plan, such as surveys, interviews, or experiments, for data collection and analysis.

πŸ“ Research Designs

What it is: The comprehensive framework for conducting a study, a blueprint for how the research will be structured to address the research question effectively.


Purpose: To ensure the data collected is relevant, reliable, and can accurately answer the research problem with minimal error.


Examples: Descriptive Designs, Experimental Designs, Quantitative Designs, Qualitative Designs, Quasi-Experimental Designs, Correlational Designs

βš™οΈ Research Methodology

What it is: The overarching strategy and the underlying philosophical assumptions that guide the research process. It explains why certain methods and designs were chosen.


Purpose: To provide a logical justification for the selected research approach and to ensure the study is systematic, valid, and reliable.


Examples:Methodologies that include grounded theory or phenomenology.

🧩 Research Methods

What it is: The specific tools and techniques used to gather, analyze, and interpret data to answer the research question.


Purpose: To provide a structured approach to investigating phenomena, enabling data collection and analysis.


Examples:Observation / Participant Observation, Surveys, Interviews, Focus Groups, Experiments, Secondary Data Analysis / Archival Study, Mixed Methods (combination of some of the above)

Comparison at a Glance

Feature Research Design Research Methodology Research Methods
Scope The overall strategy and framework for the entire project. The theoretical and philosophical underpinning of the chosen approach. The specific, practical tools and techniques for data collection and analysis.
Focus On the end product: What kind of study is being planned and what results are aimed for? On the entire research process and the logic behind it. On the individual tasks and techniques of conducting the study.
Question Asks, "What evidence is needed to answer the research question?" Asks, "Why are certain methods being used?" Asks, "What procedures or tools will be used to collect data?"
Relationship The structure within which the research is conducted. Guides the choice and application of research methods. A subset of the research methodology.
Analogy Think of a research design as an architect's blueprint for a house, which outlines the structure, scope, and plan before construction begins. The methodology explains the rationale behind the blueprint, detailing the principles and processes that will ensure the house is built correctly. The research methods are the hammers, nails, and bricks used to construct the house according to the blueprint and plan.

Types of Research - Overview

Research can be classified based on:

  • General Classification
  • The Application
  • The Purpose or Objectives
  • Methods
Descriptive Problems

These issues revolve around describing or recording a specific occurrence, incident, or circumstances.

Exploratory Problems

These problems are made to look deeply into a specific subject or issue, frequently to develop new theories or ideas.

Explanatory Problems

These issues usually involve testing ideas or hypotheses to understand why a certain phenomenon or event happens.

Predictive Problems

Making predictions or estimates about potential occurrences or patterns is required for these issues.

Evaluative Problems

These issues entail determining how well a specific intervention, program, or strategy works.

Basic (Fundamental/Pure) and Applied Research

Pure or Fundamental or Basic Research

Driven by scientist's curiosity or interest in a scientific question.

The research which is done for knowledge enhancement, the research which does not have immediate commercial potential. The research which is done for human welfare, animal welfare and plant kingdom welfare. It is called basic, pure, fundamental research.

The main motivation is to expand man's knowledge, not to create or invent something.

According to Travers: "Basic Research is designed to add to an organized body of scientific knowledge and does not necessarily produce results of immediate practical value."

Characteristics:

  • Seeks generalization
  • Aims at basic processes
  • Attempts to explain why things happen
  • Tries to get all the facts

Examples:

  • How did the universe begin?
  • What are protons, neutrons and electrons composed of?

Applied Research

Seeks to solve practical problems of the modern world employing well known and accepted theories and principles or scientific methods, rather than to acquire knowledge for knowledge's sake.

The goal of applied research is to improve the human condition. It focuses on analysis and solving social and real life problems.

Most of the experimental research, case studies and interdisciplinary research are essentially applied research. The outcome of applied research has immediate application.

Characteristics:

  • Studies individual or specific cases without the objective to generalize
  • Aims at any variable which makes the desired difference
  • Tries to say how things can be changed
  • Tries to correct the facts which are problematic
  • Reports in technical language of the discipline

Examples:

  • How to improve agricultural crop production?
  • How to treat or cure a specific disease?
  • How to improve energy efficiency at homes or offices?
  • How can communication among workers in large companies be improved?

Problem-Oriented Research

It is conducted to understand the exact nature of a problem to find out relevant solutions. The term "problem" refers to multiple choices or issues when analyzing a situation.

Research is done by industry apex body for sorting out problems faced by all the companies.

Example: Revenue of a car company has decreased by 12% in the last year. The following could be the probable causes: no optimum production, poor quality of a product, no advertising, or economic conditions.

Problem-Solving Research

This type of research is conducted by companies to understand and resolve their own problems.

Marketing research and market research are the forms of Problem-Solving Research which uses applied research to find solutions to the existing problems.

Example: Videocon international conducts research to study customer satisfaction level, it will be problem-solving research.

Action Research

Action research is a philosophy and methodology of research generally applied in the social sciences (including psychology, sociology, social work, medicine, nursing, education).

It seeks transformative change through the simultaneous process of taking action and doing research, which are linked together by critical reflection.

It is a disciplined process of inquiry conducted by and for those taking the action. The primary reason for engaging in action research is to assist the "actor" in improving and/or refining his or her actions.

Action research is very popular in the field of education because there is always room for improvement when it comes to teaching and educating others.

Descriptive and Analytical Research

Descriptive Research

It includes surveys and fact-finding enquiries of different kinds. It is directed toward studying "what" and how many of this "what". Thus, it is directed toward answering questions such as, "What is this?".

It mainly deals with the "description of the state of affairs as it is at present". It provides an accurate portrayal of characteristics of a particular individual, situation or group.

The main characteristic of this method is that the researcher has no control over the variables; he can only report what has happened or what is happening.

Mostly involves Primary data.

Examples:

  • Finding the most frequent diseases that affects the children of a town (The reader will be aware and can apply preventive measures)
  • Frequency of shopping
  • Preferences of people

Analytical Research

In analytical research, the researcher has to use facts or information already available, and analyze these to make a critical evaluation of the material. Simply, carrying out analysis on a phenomena.

Mostly involves secondary data.

The analytical research usually concerns itself with cause-effect relationships.

The distinction between descriptive and analytical research is based on the question it asks:

Descriptive research attempts to determine, describe, or identify what is, while analytical research attempts to establish why it is that way or how it came to be.

Examples:

  • What is the State wise distribution of students in ISI? - Descriptive Research
  • Why ISI is Bengali dominant? - Analytical Research

Conceptual Research

Conceptual research is that related to some abstract idea(s) or theory. It is generally used by philosophers and thinkers to develop new concepts or to reinterpret existing ones.

It focuses on the concept or theory that explains or describes the phenomenon, not the practical experiment.

Examples:

  • How can we describe the motions of the planets?
  • What are the building blocks of matter?

Empirical Research

It is data-based research, coming up with conclusions which are capable of being verified by observation or experiment.

Can also be called Experimental Research, where it is necessary to get all facts and their sources, and actively do certain things to stimulate the production of desired information.

In such a research, we have to set an experimental design and must provide a working hypothesis or guess the probable results. Then we have to work to get enough facts (data) to prove or disprove the hypothesis.

Such research is thus characterised by the experimenter's control over the variables under study and his deliberate manipulation of one of them to study its effects.

Qualitative and Quantitative Research

Qualitative Research

A process of inquiry. This is a non-statistical method.

It is concerned with qualitative phenomenon, i.e., phenomena relating to or involving quality or kind. It is dealing with phenomena that are difficult or impossible to quantify mathematically; such as beliefs, meanings, emotions, symbols, attributes, etc.

This research aims to gather an in-depth understanding of human behaviour and reasons that governs such behaviour.

Characteristics:

  • Non-numerical, descriptive, applies reasoning and uses words
  • Its aim is to get the meaning, feeling and describe the situation
  • Qualitative data cannot be graphed
  • It is exploratory
  • It investigates the why and how of decision making

Quantitative Research

Quantitative research is based on the measurement of quantity or amount. It is applicable to phenomena that can be expressed in terms of quantity.

Characteristics:

  • Numerical, non-descriptive, applies statistics or mathematics and uses numbers
  • It is an iterative process whereby evidence is evaluated
  • The results are often presented in tables and graphs
  • It is conclusive
  • It investigates the what, where and when of decision making

πŸ”¬ Selection Framework

πŸ“Š Quantitative Methods

Purpose: Test hypotheses, measure relationships numerically

Strengths:
  • Objectivity and generalizability
  • Statistical significance testing
  • Large sample capabilities
  • Replicability
Limitations:
  • Limited depth of understanding
  • May miss nuanced experiences
  • Requires existing theory

πŸ’¬ Qualitative Methods

Purpose: Explore and understand experiences, generate theories

Strengths:
  • Deep understanding
  • Contextual insight
  • Flexibility to adapt
  • Captures participant voice
Limitations:
  • Limited generalizability
  • Researcher subjectivity
  • Time-intensive analysis

πŸ”— Mixed Methods

Purpose: Comprehensive understanding combining both approaches

Advantages:
  • Triangulation of findings
  • Comprehensive insights
  • Methodological balance
  • Explains quantitative with qualitative depth
Challenges:
  • Resource-intensive
  • Requires expertise in both approaches
  • Complex analysis and integration

Other Types of Research

Primary and Secondary Research

Primary Research

Conducted by ourselves from the beginning. Primary research is a methodology used by researchers to collect data directly, rather than depending on data collected from previously done research.

Secondary Research

Secondary research is a methodology used by researchers, where they use data collected by others, previously, for their study. It involves the summary, collation and/or synthesis of existing research.

Exploratory Research

It is conducted to explore a group of questions to handle new problem areas which haven't been explored before. Investigation into a problem or situation which provides insights to the problem.

The research is meant to provide details where a small amount of information exists. It may use a variety of methods such as trial studies, interviews, group discussions, experiments, or other tactics for the purpose of gaining information.

Exploratory research is research conducted for a problem that has not been clearly defined. It is to identify key issues and key variables.

Exploratory research often relies on secondary research such as reviewing available literature and/or data, or qualitative approaches such as informal discussions with consumers, employees, management or competitors, and more formal approaches through in-depth interviews, focus groups, projective methods, case studies or pilot studies.

Explanatory Research

Explanatory research is defined as an attempt to connect ideas to understand cause and effect, meaning researchers want to explain what is going on.

Explanatory research explains how the parts of a phenomenon are related to each other. We began exploring something new with exploratory research. Then, we conducted descriptive research to increase our knowledge of it. Lastly, we need to explain it.

  • Explain Why a phenomenon is going on
  • Can be used for hypothesis testing
  • Allow for inferences to be drawn about associations and causality
  • It is conducted to understand the impact of certain changes in existing standard procedures

Correlational Research

A correlation is simply defined as a relationship between two variables. The whole purpose of using correlations in research is to figure out which variables are connected.

It is establishing a relationship between two variables. It is looking for variables that seem to interact with each other so that when we see one variable changing, we will have a fair idea about how the other variable will change.

Direction of a Correlation:

  • Positive correlation: Both variables change in the same direction (e.g., As height increases, weight also increases)
  • Negative correlation: The variables change in opposite directions (e.g., As coffee consumption increases, tiredness decreases)
  • Zero correlation: There is no relationship between the variables (e.g., Coffee consumption is not correlated with height)

Causal-Comparative Research

Causal-comparative research is an attempt to identify a causative relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable.

The relationship between the independent variable and dependent variable is usually a suggested relationship (not proven) because you (the researcher) do not have complete control over the independent variable.

In this type of research investigators attempt to determine the cause or consequences of differences that already exist between or among groups of individuals.

The basic similarity between causal-comparative and correlational studies is that both seek to explore relationships among variables. When relationships are identified through causal-comparative research, they often are studied at a later time by means of experimental research.

Historical Research

Historical research is "the systematic collection and objective evaluation of data related to past occurrences in order to test hypotheses concerning causes, effects, or trends of those events which may help to explain present events and anticipate future events" (Gay, 1981, p. 432).

Purposes of Historical Research:

  • To reconstruct the past
  • To discover unknown events
  • To understand significance of events
  • To discover the context of an organisation/movement/the situation
  • To find answers to questions about the past
  • To study cause-and-effect relationship
  • To study relationship between the past and the present
  • To record and evaluate the accomplishments of individuals, institutions and organisations
  • To provide understanding of the immediate phenomenon of concern

Types of Historical Research (Hillway, 1964):

  • Biographical research
  • Histories of institutions and organisations
  • The investigation of sources and influences
  • Editing and translating historical documents
  • Studying the history of ideas
  • Compiling bibliographies

Experimental Research

See Empirical Research section under Descriptive and Analytical Research for details on experimental research methodology.

Survey Research

Survey research is included under Descriptive Research - it includes surveys and fact-finding enquiries of different kinds to collect data from populations.

Ex-Post Facto Research

Ex post facto study or after-the-fact research is a category of research design in which the investigation starts after the fact has occurred without interference from the researcher.

The main characteristic of this method is that the researcher has no control over the variables; he can only report what has happened or what is happening.

The term ex-post facto according to Landman (1988: 62) is used to refer to an experiment in which a researcher, instead of finding a treatment, examines the effect of a naturally occurring treatment after it has occurred. In other words it is a study that attempts to discover the pre-existing causal conditions between groups.

Example: If a child is delinquent (that is, one who indulges in criminal activities), then in order to find the basic reason behind such delinquency, the researcher would try to find out the various events that have occurred and the many possibilities that could have contributed to the concerned delinquent behaviour. The expected possibilities may be lack of discipline at school/family history/peer effect/neighbourhood or socialisation.

Ethnographic Research

It refers to the investigation of a culture through an in-depth study of the members of the culture.

It involves the systematic collection, description, and analysis of data for development of theories of cultural behaviours.

Case Study

A case study is a research method involving an up-close, in-depth, and detailed examination of a particular case.

For example, a case study in medicine may examine a specific patient a doctor treated, and a case study in business might study a particular business's strategy.

Generally, a case can be nearly any unit of analysis, including individuals, organizations, events, or actions. It is commonly used in social sciences and life sciences.

Case studies are based on an in-depth investigation of a single individual, group or event to explore the causes of underlying principles.

A case study research can be single or multiple case studies, includes quantitative evidence, relies on multiple sources of evidence and benefits from the prior development of theoretical propositions.

Conclusion

Defining a research problem is not a single step, but rather a journey of refinement. Initially, the problem is stated in general terms, after which ambiguities are resolved. This ongoing process of thinking and rethinking leads to a more specific formulation of the problem, ensuring that it is realistic in terms of available data and resources, as well as analytically meaningful.

Without correctly identifying the research problem, a researcher may struggle to address it effectively. Therefore, the accurate identification and selection of a research problem at the right time play a crucial role in the successful completion of a research study.

Understanding the various types of research methodologies allows researchers to select the most appropriate approach for their specific investigation, whether it be basic or applied, qualitative or quantitative, descriptive or analytical. Each type of research serves a unique purpose and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in its own way.

References

  1. Asenahabi, B.M. (2019). Basics of Research Design. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Research, Vol.16, No.5 (ISSN: 2308-1365)
  2. Gay, L.R. (1981). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application
  3. Hillway, T. (1964). Introduction to Research
  4. Kothari, C.R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods & Techniques (2nd Rev. Ed.). New Age International Publishers
  5. Landman, J. (1988). Regret and Elation Following Action and Inaction
  6. Madhu, D.M., Hanumanthappa, R., Rosalin Geetha, I. and Kota Karuna Sri (2024). Advances in Agricultural Research Methodology (Vol. 2) (ISBN-978-93-6039-841-5)
  7. Raja, N.V. Research Methodology and Statistics for Home Science (e-book) https://e-books.inflibnet.ac.in
  8. Travers, R.M.W. An Introduction to Educational Research
  9. https://epgp.inflibnet.ac.in

πŸ§ͺ Experimental Designs

Manipulate variables to establish cause-effect relationships

βš–οΈ Quasi-Experimental

Test causality without random assignment

πŸ“Š Non-Experimental

Observe and describe without manipulation

πŸ’­ Qualitative Designs

Understand experiences and meanings

πŸ”— Mixed Methods

Combine quantitative and qualitative approaches

Introduction

  • Knowledge is created by humans.
  • Humans have long observed, experienced, experimented, reasoned, expressed, and recorded information.
  • Surviving records and experiences form the Universe of Knowledge (UoK).
  • These human activities began in prehistoric times and continue without interruption.
  • The Universe of Knowledge will keep expanding indefinitely as long as humans exist.

Objectives

  • Understand the structure and methodology of studying and understanding a subject
  • Explore various components and dimensions in subject or topic analysis
  • Learn techniques to organize and present subject knowledge

Proforma for Study of Subjects

Systematic method to gather and record subject-related information

Helps build a structured handbook

Universe of Knowledge

Important Concepts

Segment

A part of the universe of knowledge containing a subject, sometimes acting as a component of a subject system.

Subject

Composed of one or more segments of the universe of knowledge.

Subject System

A subject with components such as object, action, space, and time.

Example: History β†’ India β†’ British period.

Universe of Knowledge

The entirety of all knowledge that has survived, is currently generated, and will be generated in the future.

Characteristics of the Universe of Knowledge

  • Universe of Knowledge (UoK) is not continuous like time or a line
  • UoK is infinite, multidimensional, dynamic, and expands in all directions
  • Expansion depends on time and space being infinite; if either is zero or finite, expansion stops
  • UoK consists of scattered segments separated by space
  • Action is essential for expansion; expansion without action is incomprehensible
  • UoK is highly flexible, always allowing room for further expansion
  • Speed and form (theoretical or practical) of expansion vary in all directions
  • Expansion causes some segments to overload, reach critical mass, then split into smaller segments that keep ties to the parent segment
  • Over time, parts of two or more segments can merge to form a new segment (e.g., biochemistry), while parent segments retain their parts
  • Several segments can cluster together, each maintaining its own identity (e.g., oceanography, physical sciences)

Spiral of Scientific Method

Purpose

Dr. S. R. Ranganathan added the "Spiral of Scientific Method" chapter in the 1957 edition of his five laws of library science to prove librarianship is a science.

Definition

The "Spiral of Scientific Method", mainly in the field of library science, is a model used to describe the research process and how it evolves over time.

It is a cyclical process that involves several stages, including observation, question formulation, hypothesis testing, data collection and analysis, and conclusion drawing.

Concept

The spiral represents the scientific method as a process that moves clockwise in a circle but progresses into new areas.

It offers an overview and visual depiction of how science advances continuously yet revisits concepts at deeper levels.

Characteristics of the Spiral

Identify Research Problem

Define the question or issue to investigate

Literature Review

Examine existing studies to find knowledge gaps

Formulate Hypotheses

Develop testable predictions

Collect Data

Use surveys, interviews, observations

Analyze Data

Apply statistical methods to test hypotheses

Interpret Results

Draw conclusions and make recommendations

Disseminate Findings

Share results via publications

Reflect and Refine

Generate new questions and continue research

Structure of the Spiral

The spiral has been divided into four regions called quadrants by two straight axes intersecting each other at right angle at the centre of the spiral.

There are four cardinal points: Nadir, Ascendant, Zenith, and Descendant.

In all there are four geometrical quadrants corresponding to four major and distinct phases through which a research enquiry passes to find a solution to a formulated problem or on to its path to discover new and verified knowledge.

Spiral-of-Scientific-Method

The Structure and Phases of the Spiral

Ranganathan's Spiral consists of four quadrants that represent the key stages of scientific research. These quadrants are not isolated phases but interconnected stages that continuously interact with one another.

Spiral-of-Scientific-Method

1. Empirical Quadrant

The empirical phase marks the initial step in any research process. This stage involves the collection of raw data through direct observation or experimentation. Empirical research focuses on evidence that is tangible and observable, laying the foundation for subsequent stages of the spiral.

Focus: "What is" β€” seeking to understand the current state of affairs through first-hand observations and measurable data.

Example: Analyzing how patrons interact with a library's online catalog, or observing the frequency of resource usage in a physical library space.

2. Hypothesis Quadrant

Once enough data has been gathered, the next phase in the spiral is the hypothesis quadrant. In this stage, researchers move from observation to interpretation. Hypothesis formulation involves generating possible explanations for the empirical findings.

Key Point: Hypotheses must be both testable and falsifiable, meaning they can be proven right or wrong based on future observations.

Example: After observing library visitors, a librarian might hypothesize that quieter zones attract more patrons than noisier study areas.

3. Deductive Quadrant

In this phase, researchers begin to move into testing the hypotheses developed in the previous quadrant. Deductive reasoning involves making predictions based on the hypothesis and testing these predictions through experiments or further observations.

Process: The researcher applies logical reasoning to their hypothesis to deduce what outcomes would be expected if the hypothesis is correct.

Example: Predicting that installing more soundproofing in noisy areas will lead to increased visits to those areas, then designing an experiment to test this prediction.

4. Verification Quadrant

The verification quadrant is the final phase in Ranganathan's Spiral, where the researcher analyzes the outcomes of the deductive testing. In this phase, the researcher compares the actual results to the predicted outcomes, verifying whether the hypothesis holds true.

Note: Verification doesn't necessarily mean finality β€” if the results are inconclusive or contradictory, researchers can cycle back through the quadrants. This is the beauty of Ranganathan's Spiral: the scientific method is not linear but circular, allowing researchers to keep refining their ideas and approaches until they reach more conclusive results.

Modes of Formation of Subjects

When ideas are organized into a coherent framework, they form a distinct subject or domain. The methods used to structure these subjects create a system of relationships that guide how ideas connect and evolve. This systematic approach shapes the subject's overall structure, leaving a lasting impact on how concepts are understood and applied.

Ranganathan (1950s) identified four main modes to form subjects in the knowledge universe:

Loose Assemblage

Loose Assemblage refers to the combination of two or more subjects or facets to form a complex subject. It involves examining their mutual relations through various types such as comparison, influence, or tool usage.

Forms complex subjects by combining multiple simple or compound subjects or isolates:

  • Assemblage 1: Relates subjects (e.g., "Physics compared with Chemistry")
  • Assemblage 2: Relates isolates from the same schedule (e.g., "Comparison of Hinduism and Buddhism")
  • Assemblage 3: Relates isolates within an array (e.g., "UDC compared to DDC")
Lamination

Lamination involves overlaying facets or elements to form a subject. It can create compound subjects by combining different facets with a basic subject.

Forms subjects by overlaying facets:

  • Lamination 1: Combines one or more isolate facets with a basic subject (Example: "Botany Morphology")
  • Lamination 2: Combines species of basic subjects or isolates (Example: "Urban Youths")
Dissection

Dissection divides a broad subject into smaller, coordinate parts for better organization and understanding. It ensures logical segmentation without altering the essence of components.

Example: "Life Sciences" split into "Botany" and "Zoology"; "India" divided into "States"

Denudation

Denudation narrows a subject's scope by reducing its breadth (extension) while increasing its depth (intension).

Example: World β†’ Asia β†’ India β†’ Tamil Nadu β†’ Madurai

Additional Formation Modes

Fission

Fission is the process of dividing a basic subject or an isolate into smaller, coordinate subfields.

  • Fission of Basic Subject: "Biology" split into "Botany" and "Zoology"
  • Fission of Isolate Ideas: "Asia β†’ China, India, Iran, etc."
Fusion

Fusion is the process where two or more primary basic subjects combine to form a new subject, losing their individual identities in the process.

Example: Biology + Chemistry = Biochemistry

Distillation

Distillation is the process of creating a pure discipline from a compound subject. It involves extracting a primary basic subject from its interaction with other subjects.

Example: "Microbiology" and "Forestry" distilled from Biology

Agglomeration

Agglomeration refers to the collection of multiple entities into a large mass without cohesion among the components.

Example: "Natural Sciences" or "History and Economics"

Cluster

Cluster refers to the grouping of several specialized studies or entities on a particular phenomenon or topic into a broader field of study. Also known as a subject bundle.

Example: "Social Science" or "Natural Science"

Terminological Development

Track the evolution of terminology used for the subject

Example: Library Science evolved from Library Economy to Librarianship

Scope of the Subject

Divisions & Subdivisions

How the subject is organized

Applications

Applications in other areas

Tool-Subjects

Subjects that support the subject's growth

Development of the Subject

  • Landmarks: Key contributors and chronological growth
  • Research Trends: Current areas of focus
  • Trends in Education: Across UG, PG, and Research levels

Sources of Information

Documentary

Primary and Secondary sources

Institutional

International, National, Local

Human Experts

Renowned specialists

Information Transfer

  • Study of user behavior and information-seeking patterns
  • Formulate typical queries based on user needs

πŸ› οΈ Interactive Research Design Selector

Answer the questions below to get personalized recommendations for your research design

1. Basics
2. Objectives
3. Resources
4. Constraints
5. Results

πŸ“š Basic Information

πŸ“š Essential Research Resources

πŸ”— Research Databases

PubMed: Medical literature

Google Scholar: Academic search

PsycINFO: Psychology research

ERIC: Education resources

πŸ› οΈ Research Tools

G*Power: Sample size calculation

SPSS/R: Statistical analysis

NVivo/Atlas.ti: Qualitative analysis

Zotero: Reference management

πŸ“Š Analysis Software

Quantitative: SPSS, R, Stata, SAS

Qualitative: NVivo, Atlas.ti, Dedoose

Mixed Methods: MaxQDA, NVivo

Free Options: R, JASP, PSPP

πŸ“‹ Guidelines & Standards

PRISMA: Systematic reviews

CONSORT: Clinical trials

STROBE: Observational studies

COREQ: Qualitative research

πŸ’‘ Best Practices & Tips

βœ… Research Excellence Checklist

  • Begin with clear, focused research questions
  • Select methods based on questions, not convenience
  • Consider ethical implications from project inception
  • Plan for adequate sample size and statistical power
  • Document all procedures for reproducibility
  • Maintain rigorous quality standards throughout
  • Report findings transparently with limitations
  • Consider broader impact and dissemination strategies

⚠️ Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Methodology Mismatch: Using methods that don't answer your research questions
  • Inadequate Sample Size: Too small for meaningful statistical analysis
  • Bias Introduction: Uncontrolled confounding variables
  • Ethical Oversights: Insufficient protection of participants
  • Poor Documentation: Inability to replicate procedures

🧠 Test Your Research Knowledge

Which research design is best for establishing cause-and-effect relationships?
Cross-sectional study
Randomized controlled trial
Case study
Correlational study
Question 1 of 10 Score: 0